AQ Scoring Framework:
AIM’s methodology for curating ahimsak investment
1. Introduction
About AIM
AIM (the Ahimsa Investment Movement) is a community of individuals who believe in the principle of ahimsa — non-harm — and who work to promote ethical investment through research, education and engagement. AIM is an initiative of the AhimsaGain Foundation, a Section 8 (not-for-profit) company based in Mumbai, India.
Purpose of this Document
This document explains the framework, the rules and the process AIM uses to classify publicly listed companies according to how much their business kills or harms animals.
In today’s connected economy, almost no company is completely free from causing some harm. The aim is therefore not to find companies that are 100% ahimsak, but to help investors send their money towards companies that cause relatively less harm to animals — and away from those that cause more.
2. Our Goal
To help money flow towards relatively ahimsak (non-harming) business activities, and away from companies that harm animals. We do this by:
- Educating retail investors about cruelty-free and ahimsa-aligned investing, through research, content and social media.
- Working with financial institutions — helping them build lists of ahimsak stocks and design cruelty-free financial products.
3. Understanding Ahimsa Quotient (AQ)
Ahimsa means non-violence — avoiding harm to living beings. Two words are used throughout this document:
- Himsak — harm-causing; an activity, ingredient or product that kills or harms living beings.
- Ahimsak — non-harming; an activity that avoids or reduces harm to living beings.
Because ahimsa is a personal and subjective value, the AQ framework does not try to give a single exact score. Instead it sorts each company into one of three colour bands that broadly show how much its business adds to harm i.e. whether it is High AQ (Green), Medium AQ (Orange) or Low AQ (Red).
4. The Main Test — What a Company Actually Does
This is the single most important rule, and every decision below follows from it:
“We rate a company on what its business actually does — the products it makes and the money it earns — not on every possible indirect link.”
Put simply:
- If making or selling an animal product, or running a harmful activity, is a real and significant part of the business, the company moves to a worse band of AQ (Red or Orange).
- If the animal link is very small, easily replaced, or only a far-fetched possibility, it does not move the company down — the company stays Green, i.e. High AQ.
To keep this consistent, we use these plain meanings throughout:
- A real and significant part — the animal product or activity is a proper product line, or earns a meaningful share of revenue. It is not a one-off.
- Very small — a tiny amount of an ingredient, or a side activity that earns almost nothing.
- Easily replaced — the animal ingredient can be swapped for a plant or mineral one with no real change to the product.
- Far-fetched link — a link that is only theoretically possible, such as “someone, somewhere, might use our product on an animal.”
Two companies in the same industry can land in different bands because what matters is the company’s own business mix—not the name of its sector.
5. The Three Colour Bands of AQ
AIM places every company into one of three bands (Red, Orange, Green), based on how directly and how much a company aligns with ahimsa towards animals. Each band has a corresponding Ahimsa Quotient (AQ)—a broad indicator of AQ is currently shown as High, Medium or Low. Over time we plan to develop a numeric AQ score for finer details.
| Band | AQ | What it Means | Typical Examples |
|---|---|---|---|
| RED | Low AQ | The business directly harms animals, earns a significant share of revenue from animal-based products, or is built on a core animal-harm activity. Also covers harmful “vice” products. | Meat, poultry, fish, eggs and dairy; leather, wool and silk goods; animal feed; drug and cosmetic makers; animal-testing labs; insecticide makers; alcohol, tobacco, weapons and gambling. |
| ORANGE | Medium AQ | The business is mostly animal-neutral but has one real, smaller animal-based product line, or directly sells/serves some animal food. Also most finance companies, because they put money into a wide mix of industries that includes animal-based ones. | Hotels and amusement parks serving non-veg food; an FMCG firm with a small honey/ghee line; a clothing house with a small leather line; banks, NBFCs, broking, asset-management and holding/investment companies. |
| GREEN | High AQ | Very little or no animal involvement—only a tiny ingredient, a far-fetched link, or none at all. | Software and IT; telecom and media; auto parts; most chemicals; cement; machinery; hospitals; mining and oil & gas; synthetic-leather makers; home-loan companies; insurers and stock exchanges. |
The Ahimsa Quotient (AQ)
| Band | AQ | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| GREEN | High | Minimal or no involvement in animal harm. |
| ORANGE | Medium | A genuine but smaller animal-linked involvement, or money spread across the economy (finance). |
| RED | Low | Direct, significant, or core involvement in animal harm. |
6. What Does NOT Move a Company to a Worse Band
- Serving many industries. Generic supply, services, software, logistics, transport, utilities, rent or advertising sold to many industries—even if some customers harm animals. Only products made specifically FOR an animal industry count.
- Tiny processing helpers. A small, usually plant- or mineral-based helper used while making the product (for example, stearic acid used as a grinding or vulcanising aid) that is not a real part of the finished product.
- Running-the-machinery items. Things like lubricants and cutting fluids used to keep machines running—these are not a product, are not animal-specific, and are almost always mineral or synthetic.
- Environmental impact. Damage to habitat or environment (for example, from mining or extraction) does not by itself change the AQ band. Environmental concerns are noted, but AQ measures harm to animals.
- Economy-wide safety testing. Animal testing that the law requires before many ordinary products (chemicals, agrochemicals) can be registered is a standard, economy-wide step—not a basis. (The exception for drug and cosmetic makers and testing labs is in Section 8.)
- Distant or far-fetched links. Lending to, investing in, supplying or serving an industry that uses animals—by itself—does not make a company Red. (For finance, see Section 9.)
7. The Core-vs-Minority Test
When a company does have some animal link, this simple ladder decides the AQ band:
- Core or large share → Red (Low AQ). The animal product or activity is the heart of the business, or earns a large share of revenue.
- Real but smaller line → Orange (Medium AQ). It is a genuine product line, but only a minority part of an otherwise animal-neutral business.
- Tiny, replaceable or far-fetched → Green (High AQ). The link is very small, easily swapped for a non-animal option, or only a distant possibility.
The same animal material can therefore land a company in any of the three bands, depending on how big a part of the business it is. The table below shows this with real examples:
Animal Material Classification Examples
The same animal material can therefore place a company in any of the three AQ bands, depending on how significant it is within the overall business. The table below illustrates this using real company examples.
| Animal Material | Core → Red (Low AQ) | Minor Line → Orange (Medium AQ) | Tiny / None → Green (High AQ) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leather | Bata, Metro Brands — leather footwear is the core product. | Titan — a small leather-goods line beside its gold jewellery. | Relaxo, Campus — non-leather (rubber / PU / EVA) footwear. |
| Dairy / Honey | Nestlé, Britannia — dairy is a core business. | Emami, Patanjali — a small honey / ghee line. | Tata Consumer, Marico — plant-based, only a negligible honey line. |
| Wool / Silk | Raymond (worsted wool), Sai Silks (silk sarees) — the core material. | Vardhman — a small wool line within a cotton / poly business. | Page, Lux, most cotton / synthetic apparel makers. |
| Non-veg Food | Meat processors; Zomato (Hyperpure meat distribution). | Hotels, Imagicaa, Wonderla — serve non-veg as a minor line. | Pure-veg snack makers; businesses that serve no food. |
8. Special Rules by Situation
A small set of specific rules keeps similar cases treated the same way:
| Situation | How it is Applied | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Harmful “Vice” Products | Alcohol, tobacco, weapons / explosives and gambling are Red on harmful-product grounds on their own, regardless of any animal link. This covers weapons, munitions and military platforms only. A maker of civil-aircraft components with no weapons (for example, parts for Airbus or Boeing) remains Green. | Breweries and distilleries; cigarette makers; defence, explosives and warship builders; casino / gaming operators. |
| Insecticides and Rodenticides | Products designed to kill insects or rodents (which are animals) are classified as Red. Makers of only herbicides or fungicides are not moved down on this basis. | Coromandel, Bharat Rasayan (insecticide lines); Godrej’s Good Knight / HIT household pest control. |
| Made Specially for Animal Industries | Products created specifically for animal-rearing or animal processing move the company down. If this is the core business → Red. If it is only a small line → Orange. | Animal / poultry / aqua feed and vet inputs (core) → Red. Small animal-nutrition or leather-chemicals lines → Orange (Jubilant Ingrevia, Rossari, Balmer Lawrie). |
| Drug & Cosmetic Makers and Testing Labs | A company whose core business is making drugs or cosmetics relies on large-scale, legally required live-animal testing and is therefore Red. Contract Research Organisations (CROs) and biotech firms that conduct animal testing or depend on animal-derived lab materials are also Red. Hospitals merely using medicines remain Green. |
Pharma and cosmetic makers → Red. Testing CROs such as Syngene and Indegene → Red. Hospitals → Green. |
| Pharma Inputs, Herbal / AYUSH & OTC Makers | Suppliers of pharma inputs only (mineral excipients, salts or intermediates) remain Green if they do not manufacture finished drugs or conduct animal testing. Ayurveda / AYUSH businesses are assessed based on their ingredients. OTC and consumer-health drug makers continue to follow the drug-maker rule. |
Sudeep Pharma → Green. Jeena Sikho → Green. Sanofi Consumer Healthcare → Red. |
| Situation | How it is Applied | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Animal Materials Built into a Product | Where an animal-derived material is built into a device or item (for example, cattle tissue, pig heart valves or heparin), the manufacturer is classified as Red. By contrast, device or contraceptive makers with no animal material built in (such as latex condoms, water-based lubricants or diagnostic kits) remain Green. | Medical-device maker using animal tissue (Poly Medicure). |
| Selling or Serving Animal Food Directly | A company that itself sells or serves animal food moves down, even if it represents only a minority of revenue. Core meat businesses or meat distributors are Red, while side menus or smaller product lines are Orange. Businesses providing only logistics or storage remain Green. |
Restaurants / meat distribution (Devyani, Zomato) → Red. Hotels and parks serving non-veg → Orange. Cold-chain logistics → Green. |
| Online Platforms — Delivery, Quick-Commerce & Marketplaces | Online platforms are rated according to whether they themselves sell or distribute animal products. Dedicated B2B meat or seafood distribution businesses are classified as Red. Consumer platforms directly retailing packaged non-vegetarian products or marketplaces monetising catalogues containing leather, silk or wool are classified as Orange. Neutral infrastructure providers such as payment rails, listings, classifieds or freight services remain Green. |
Red: Zomato via Hyperpure Orange: Swiggy, Meesho Green: IndiaMART, CarTrade, BlackBuck |
| Holding & Diversified Companies | Groups are classified according to their dominant business rather than simply because they are holding companies. AIM looks through the corporate structure to identify where the primary value is generated. |
Bombay Burmah via Britannia → Red. E.I.D. Parry via Coromandel → Red. Eicher via Royal Enfield → Orange. |
| Synthetic Substitutes | Synthetic products that replace animal-derived materials help save animal lives and are therefore treated as Green and considered investible. | Synthetic (PVC / PU) leather, plant-based alternatives and synthetic substitutes. |
| Jewellery & Accessories | Gold, diamond and gemstone jewellery are considered animal-neutral and classified as Green. A genuine product line using leather goods, pearls or coral moves the company to Orange. An occasional pearl or shell product is too small to affect the classification. |
Kalyan, Senco (gold / diamond) → Green. Ethos (pearl / coral line) → Orange. |
9. Finance Companies — Orange or Green
Finance companies are judged according to what their money ultimately supports. The AQ depends on whether money is spread across many industries (including animal-based businesses) or is restricted to one animal-neutral purpose.
- Orange (Medium AQ) — Money spread across the economy. Finance companies that lend or invest across a wide mix of industries, including animal-based businesses.
- Green (High AQ) — Money restricted to one animal-neutral purpose, or companies providing neutral market infrastructure that does not itself direct capital into animal businesses.
| Band | Which Finance Companies |
|---|---|
| ORANGE | Banks (private, public and others), NBFCs, consumer-finance lenders, microfinance companies, stock-broking firms, asset-management / mutual-fund companies, and holding or investment companies. |
| GREEN | Home-loan / housing-finance companies, insurers, single-sector financiers tied to an animal-neutral purpose (IRFC, IREDA, HUDCO), stock exchanges, depositories and clearing houses. |
Rule of Thumb
If the money goes broadly across the economy, the company is classified as Orange. If the money is locked to one animal-neutral purpose, or represents pure market infrastructure, it is classified as Green.
10. Guiding Principle: Prioritisation
What is harmful to one is ultimately harmful to all. In the short term, however, the interests of different living beings do not always align. Where these interests conflict, AIM gives priority to saving life now over longer-term or indirect harm.
Example
Synthetic vs. Leather Vehicle Seats
Synthetic seats are made of plastic that takes a long time to break down, so they carry an environmental cost. However, they replace leather and therefore save animal lives immediately. Because saving life comes first in the short term, synthetic seats are treated as investible and classified as Green.
11. Sources Used for Classification
AIM uses publicly available information together with company-published disclosures while determining company classifications. These sources include:
- Annual reports, investor presentations and segment disclosures.
- Company websites and product catalogues.
- Regulatory filings and stock-exchange disclosures.
- Sustainability, ESG and integrated reports.
- Industry reports, market research and credible media sources.
- Information published by government agencies and recognised industry associations.
Before relying on any assumption, AIM verifies the underlying facts. For example, it checks whether Indian sugar refining uses bone char (it does not, as Indian mills use the sulphitation process), whether a company described as a leather manufacturer actually produces animal leather or synthetic alternatives, and whether products such as meat masalas contain meat (they do not, as they are plant-based spice blends). Where evidence is limited or conflicting, AIM temporarily assigns the safer (higher-harm) band until better information becomes available.
12. The Classification Process
Every company is evaluated through a structured classification process to ensure consistency, transparency and fairness.
1. Examine the Business
Study the company’s actual products, raw materials, business segments and revenue mix using primary sources rather than relying solely on the sector label.
2. Apply the Main Test
Ask the Section 4 question: Is the company’s own animal involvement a real and significant part of the business, or only a small or far-fetched link?
3. Check the Share and the Rules
Estimate the share of revenue generated from himsak activities and apply the framework rules described in Sections 6–9.
4. Assign the Band
Assign the company to the appropriate Red, Orange or Green band and document a short, factual explanation supporting the classification.
5. Peer-Check and Review
Compare classifications with similar companies within the same sector so that like is treated as like, and revisit classifications whenever new information becomes available.
Companies Not Yet Individually Rated
Where a company has not yet been individually rated, investors can identify its industry segment and use that industry’s usual AQ band as a reasonable starting point, while remembering that the company’s own business mix may ultimately place it in a different band.
13. Worked Examples
The examples below show how the rules work in practice, using real companies alongside common company types.
| Company / Type | Band | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Meat, poultry or dairy processor (e.g. Nestlé, Britannia) | Red (Low AQ) | Directly processes animals or sells animal-based food as a core business. |
| Leather footwear or silk-saree house (Bata, Sai Silks) | Red (Low AQ) | The animal-derived material is the core product identity. |
| Pharmaceutical maker; animal-testing lab (Syngene) | Red (Low AQ) | Core business depends on large-scale, legally required live-animal testing. |
| Insecticide / crop-protection maker (Coromandel) | Red (Low AQ) | Insecticides are designed to kill insects (animals) — direct animal harm. |
| Brewery, distillery, tobacco, defence or casino (Delta Corp) | Red (Low AQ) | Harmful “vice” category — Red regardless of any animal link. |
| Animal-feed / poultry-feed maker | Red (Low AQ) | A product made specifically for the animal-rearing industry, as a core business. |
| Hotel or amusement park (serves non-veg) | Orange (Medium AQ) | Mainly rooms or rides, but directly serves non-veg food as a minor line. |
| Bank, NBFC, broker or holding company | Orange (Medium AQ) | Money is spread across a wide mix of industries that includes animal-based ones. |
| FMCG with a small honey / ghee line (Emami) | Orange (Medium AQ) | Mostly plant / mineral products, with a genuine but smaller animal-based line. |
| Jewellery house with a small leather line (Titan) | Orange (Medium AQ) | Mostly gold and diamond (neutral), with a real but smaller leather-goods line. |
| Synthetic (PVC / PU) “leather” maker | Green (High AQ) | A leather substitute — no animal hide; it saves animal lives. |
| Paint or tyre maker (Asian Paints, Apollo Tyres) | Green (High AQ) | Synthetic and mineral materials; stearic acid is a tiny, replaceable, largely plant-based helper. |
| Software / IT services firm | Green (High AQ) | Digital services — serving many industries (some of which use animals) is not a basis. |
| Hospital | Green (High AQ) | Life-saving human care; medicines and consumables are a side input, not animal-harm revenue. |
| Sugar mill | Green (High AQ) | Indian mills decolourise sugar by the sulphitation process, not bone char — so it is plant-based. |
| Home-loan company or insurer (IRFC, ICICI Lombard) | Green (High AQ) | Money is locked to a single animal-neutral use; any livestock cover is a tiny sub-line. |
| Mining or oil-and-gas extraction | Green (High AQ) | Inorganic extraction; habitat / environmental impact is outside the animal-harm band. |
14. Important Considerations & Disclaimer
This framework is a good-faith tool for raising awareness and guiding ethical investment.
- The aim is to raise awareness of ahimsa and to help investors choose companies that cause relatively less harm to animals.
- This classification is neutral with respect to religion, caste and region, and rests on the single question of himsa (harm) or ahimsa (non-harm).
- Ahimsa is a deeply subjective idea; no classification can be fully objective. The colour band and Ahimsa Quotient (AQ) provide a broad indication rather than an exact measurement.
- Many companies operate across several business segments where himsak and ahimsak revenue cannot be separated precisely. In such situations, the AQ band is assigned using the best available judgement while looking through to the company’s principal business activity.
- Ratings rely on publicly available information together with reasonable judgement and may change as additional or more detailed information becomes available.
- Institutions and individual investors should exercise their own discretion while using this framework. If any discrepancy or new evidence is identified, AIM welcomes feedback and will review and revise the classification where appropriate.
Framework Evolution
The AIM Ahimsa Classification Framework is intended to evolve over time. As industries change and new information becomes available, the methodology, examples and Ahimsa Quotient (AQ) classifications may be refined to improve consistency, transparency and accuracy while remaining aligned with the principle of ahimsa.
AQ Scoring- Explanation
Assigning AQ (Ahimsa Quotient) score
Assign AQ (Ahimsa Quotient) score to companies and then classify them into green, orange and red categories based on above criteria.
Prioritisation:
What is harmful to one is ultimately harmful to all.
However, at times, the interests of one don’t align with those of the others in the short run.
In such situations, the immediate saving of lives would be considered a priority over long term harm.
For example, vehicle seats made from synthetic materials are generally considered pollutants that take a very long time for bio-degradation and hence harmful to the planet. However, they replace leather, thus saving animal lives immediately and so would be considered investible.
Industry classification-
National Stock Exchange of India is having a list of some183 industries. We have classified these industries in Green, Orange & Red categories based on above himsak/ahimsak criteria.
We have done research of 1,000+ companies and assigned ratings to them. We are regularly adding more companies in this list.
For companies not covered by us, investors can take help of industry classification and find companies falls in which ‘industry segment’. Accordingly, investor will be able to categories particular company.
Disclaimer-
- The whole objective of this classification is to create awareness about ‘ahimsa’ principle and provide opportunity to investors to invest in companies doing least harm to individuals, animals, birds, sea creatures and environment.
- This classification and all work of AIM are neutral to any religion, caste or region.
- The entire exercise to classify companies are based on fundamental principle of ‘ Himsa or Ahimsa’.
- Ahimsa is a very subjective term and no individual can define it in objective term with 100% accuracy. However, we have taken proper care to classify companies based on parameters given above and based on information available.
- There are many companies operating in various business segments (diversified) and it is difficult to segregate himsak and ahimsak activities and revenue from each business segment. We have tried to classify them in Green, Orange and Red categories to the best of our judgement.
- The whole idea is to provide broad indication about nature of activities of the companies.
- We do not claim all data to be 100% scientifically or mathematically true. We have relied on publicly available information and own judgement applied where data not available.
- It is possible that all companies may directly or indirectly cause harm to one or other living beings. But, our aim is to arrive at company list which is causing ‘least harm’.
- We could get exact segment wise revenue and raw material value data for some companies. For other companies, we have applied our judgement based on available information for particular industry.
- This classification and research work is an ongoing exercise and there may be some changes based on more research or more details available.
- Institutions and Individual investors should exercise their own discretion while using these data.
- If any person/company find any discrepancies in data/ratings of AIM then we will be happy to discuss and revise ratings based on additional data/information received from such company.
